We're open for suggestions and feedback, as well as ideas for additions to our gameservers.
Post a reply

Re: Alternatives to Attachments

23 May 2011, 22:38

If you're only going to put images on your Dropbox, I doubt that

Re: Alternatives to Attachments

23 May 2011, 23:10

no not just images, video files as well

Re: Alternatives to Attachments

24 May 2011, 07:46

then you're going off topic? we're talking about alternatives to attachments here (pictures/screenshots), so 2GB will be enough.

Re: Alternatives to Attachments

24 May 2011, 12:50

haha I know, I was just asking though..

Re: Alternatives to Attachments

25 May 2011, 06:12

own webspace > all

Image

Re: Alternatives to Attachments

25 May 2011, 06:36

No, that's too complicated. :(
Imageshack <3

Re: Alternatives to Attachments

25 May 2011, 08:01

i mainly use http://666kb.com

no ads, good speeds ... tho LTB told me different ._.
only downside is that all pictures hafta be less than 666kb , hence the name

Re: Alternatives to Attachments

26 May 2011, 01:42

hah all good places, but like I said
imageurlhost is what I use...

VERY SIMPLE to use
DON'T Need to make an account

You just upload
and click on the link you want to use it as (BBCODE, HTML, Regular link, etc.) And paste it somewhere. Boom simple as that :D

Re: Alternatives to Attachments

26 May 2011, 13:24

I mainly use http://photobucket.com/ for uploading and sharing photos. Give you a variety of options when photos uploads to do thing such as copy URL, copy img link and so on

Re: Alternatives to Attachments

26 May 2011, 14:18

chinichi wrote:i mainly use http://666kb.com

no ads, good speeds ... tho LTB told me different ._.
only downside is that all pictures hafta be less than 666kb , hence the name


It's useless because it doesn't even load?

And 666kb is not enough.

Re: Alternatives to Attachments

29 May 2011, 18:42

Flex My Rex wrote:
chinichi wrote:i mainly use http://666kb.com

no ads, good speeds ... tho LTB told me different ._.
only downside is that all pictures hafta be less than 666kb , hence the name


It's useless because it doesn't even load?

And 666kb is not enough.


it all depends on the image file size though sometimes
Post a reply